Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
AbstractFor a long time, the dominant approach to studying decision making under risk has been to use psychoeconomic functions to account for how behavior deviates from the normative prescriptions of expected value maximization. While this neo-Bernoullian tradition has advanced the field in various ways—such as identifying seminal phenomena of risky choice —it contains a major shortcoming: Psychoeconomic curves are mute with regard to the cognitive mechanisms underlying risky choice. This neglect of the mechanisms both limits the explanatory value of neo-Bernoullian models and fails to provide guidance for designing effective interventions to improve decision making. Here we showcase a recent “attentional turn” in research on risk choice that elaborates how deviations from normative prescriptions can result from imbalances in attention allocation and that thus promises to overcome the challenges of the neo-Bernoullian tradition. We argue that a comprehensive understanding of preference formation in risky choice must provide an account on a mechanistic level, and we delineate directions in which existing theories that rely on attentional processes may be extended to achieve this objective.
Similar books and articles
Stronger Attentional Biases Can Be Linked to Higher Reward Rate in Preferential Choice.Veronika Zilker - 2022 - Cognition 225:105095.
Cognitive Models of Risky Choice: Parameter Stability and Predictive Accuracy of Prospect Theory.Andreas Glöckner & Thorsten Pachur - 2012 - Cognition 123 (1):21-32.
Individual-Level Loss Aversion in Riskless and Risky Choices.Simon Gächter, Eric J. Johnson & Andreas Herrmann - 2021 - Theory and Decision 92 (3-4):599-624.
The Influence of Trait Emotion and Spatial Distance on Risky Choice Under the Framework of Gain and Loss.Fuming Xu & Long Huang - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
A Dual-Pathway Perspective on Food Choices in Adolescents: The Role of Loss of Control Over Eating.Eva Van Malderen, Eva Kemps, Laurence Claes, Sandra Verbeken & Lien Goossens - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Out of Sight – Out of Mind? Information Acquisition Patterns in Risky Choice Framing.Anton Kühberger & Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck - 2014 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 45 (1):21-28.
Ethical Problems in Research on Risky Behaviors and Risky Populations.Sandra Scarr - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):147 – 155.
Attentional Focus Instructions Do Not Affect Choice Reaction Time.Gal Ziv & Ronnie Lidor - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Make‐or‐Break: Chasing Risky Goals or Settling for Safe Rewards?Pantelis P. Analytis, Charley M. Wu & Alexandros Gelastopoulos - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (7).
Incomplete Risk Attitudes and Random Choice Behavior: An Elicitation Mechanism.Edi Karni - 2021 - Theory and Decision 92 (3-4):677-687.
Choice Output and Choice Processing: An Analogy to Similarity.Arthur B. Markman - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):423-424.
Testing the Effects of Similarity on Risky Choice: Implications for Violations of Expected Utility.David E. Buschena & David Zilberman - 1999 - Theory and Decision 46 (3):253-280.
Implications of the Level of Dogmatism and Selected Psychosocial Conditions for a Propensity for Risky Behaviour Among the Soldiers of the Polish Army Land Forces.Sylwia Fijałkowska - 2010 - Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration 16 (1-2):155-172.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Theory of Games and Economic Behavior.John von Neumann & Oskar Morgenstern - 1944 - Science and Society 9 (4):366-369.
Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic-Cognitive Approach to Decision Making in an Uncertain Environment.Jerome R. Busemeyer & James T. Townsend - 1993 - Psychological Review 100 (3):432-459.
The Priority Heuristic: Making Choices Without Trade-Offs.Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer & Ralph Hertwig - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (2):409-432.
Strategy Selection as Rational Metareasoning.Falk Lieder & Thomas L. Griffiths - 2017 - Psychological Review 124 (6):762-794.