Tactile relief: Reconsidering medium and modality specificity

British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (4):426-437 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My aim is to show that dissatisfaction with the term ‘tactile pictures’ and the proposal for ‘a multisensory pictorial aesthetic’ introduced by Dominic Lopes is due to an ambiguity of ‘picture’ between visual and spatial representation in-volving more than one sense. In order to avoid this ambiguity, I propose another term in its place and I investigate some of the directions that a richer multimedia and multimodal aesthetic can take.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#419,193)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Sight and touch.Michael Martin - 1992 - In Tim Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tactual perception.M. Scott - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):149-160.
Art Media and the Sense Modalities: Tactile Pictures.Dominic M. M. Lopes - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):425-440.
Touching pictures.Robert Hopkins - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (1):149-167.

Add more references