Imagination, Representation and Repetition
Abstract
This paper discusses Derrida's Husserl in the "research logic" made of "real discourse" and "Imagine discourse" deconstruction of the distinction. For Derrida, whether real or imagined words of discourse, the first is a "source of the repeated structure." This repetition of the origin of words and imagination than a real distinction between the more ancient word, it is all words and even all the symbols of the "common root." This article details the process of combing the deconstruction of Derrida and deconstruction strategies, and pointed out that the ultimate goal of deconstruction is to deconstruct the traditional metaphysics and the replacement of the established differences between the primitive system, which reveals that the significance of the deconstruction of Western metaphysics. This article focuses on the Derrida's deconstruction of the distinction between the effective speech and the imaginary speech implied in Husserl's Logical Investigations. Derrida pointed out that both the effective speech and the imaginary speech are all a primordially repetitive structure. This primordial repetition is older than the distinction, and is the common root of all the signs . After the discussion of the process and the strategy of this deconstruction, the writer discloses the end of this deconstruction: which is to deconstruct the whole system of difference between origin and supplement in the traditional metaphysics