Beyond Market Strategies: How Multiple Decision-Maker Groups Jointly Influence Underperforming Firms’ Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility

Journal of Business Ethics 178 (2):481-499 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research based on the behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF) argues that firms will actively adopt strategic actions to respond to performance that falls below aspirations, that is performance shortfalls. However, most previous studies have focused on market-related strategic actions, paying less attention to the impact of performance shortfalls on non-market-related strategic actions, especially corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate social irresponsibility (CSI). In this study, we propose that firms facing performance shortfalls are likely to reduce CSR levels and increase CSI levels. In addition, we also propose that board characteristics (board size, board age and board tenure) have a significant moderating effect on the above relationship. Empirical analyses based on an unbalanced panel data of China's listed firms from 2010 to 2018 show that our arguments are largely supported.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personal Social Responsibility and Its Impact to Consumerism.Marta Karwacka - 2019 - In Aneta Długopolska-Mikonowicz, Sylwia Przytuła & Christopher Stehr (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland: Strategies, Opportunities and Challenges. Springer Verlag. pp. 239-251.
Inconsistencies in activists' behaviours and the ethics of ngos.Yves Fassin - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):503 - 521.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-31

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?