Open Philosophy 2 (1):39-48 (2019)
AbstractA central theme in western philosophy was to find formal methods that can reliably discover empirical relationships and their explanations from data assembled from experience. As a philosophical project, that ambition was abandoned in the 20th century and generally dismissed as impossible. It was replaced in philosophy by neo-Kantian efforts at reconstruction and justification, and in professional statistics by the more limited ambition to estimate a small number of parameters in pre-specified hypotheses. The influx of “big data” from climate science, neuropsychology, biology, astronomy and elsewhere implicitly called for a revival of the grander philosophical ambition. Search algorithms are meeting that call, but they pose a problem: how are their accuracies to be assessed in domains where experimentation is limited or impossible? Increasingly, the answer is through simulation of data from models of the kind of process in the domain. In some cases, these innovations require rethinking how the accuracy and informativeness of inference methods can be assessed. Focusing on causal inference, we give an example from neuroscience, but to show that the model/simulation strategy is not confined to causal inference, we also consider two classification problems from astrophysics: identifying exoplanets and identifying dark matter concentrations.
Similar books and articles
Automated Search for Causal Relations - Theory and Practice.Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines - unknown
Computer simulation and the features of novel empirical data.Greg Lusk - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:145-152.
Often Trusted But Never (Properly) Tested: Evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis,.Michael Baumgartner & Alrik Thiem - forthcoming - Sociological Methods & Research.
Is computer simulation changing the face of experimentation?Ronald N. Giere - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):59 - 62.
The perils of tweaking: how to use macrodata to set parameters in complex simulation models.Brian Epstein & Patrick Forber - 2013 - Synthese 190 (2):203-218.
On the Theoretical Limits to Reliable Causal Inference.Benoit Desjardins - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Comorbid science?David Danks, Stephen Fancsali, Clark Glymour & Richard Scheines - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):153 - 155.
Causal discovery from nonstationary/heterogeneous data : skeleton estimation and orientation determination.Kun Zhang, Biwei Huang, Jiji Zhang, Clark Glymour & Bernhard Schölkopf - unknown
Using models to correct data: paleodiversity and the fossil record.Alisa Bokulich - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 24):5919-5940.
Causal Models in Social Science: Determining the Causal Structure of a Social System in a Nonexperimental Setting.Richard Paul Scheines - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Computer simulation: The cooperation between experimenting and modeling.Johannes Lenhard - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (2):176-194.
Nonparametric Estimation, Forecasts, and Model Evaluation of Spatial Temporal Point Process Models for California Seismicity.Gordon Joshua Seth - unknown
Data models and the acquisition and manipulation of data.Todd Harris - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.
Biogeochemical Models in the Environmental Sciences. The Dynamical System Paradigm and the Role of Simulation Modeling.Daniel Haag & Martin Kaupenjohann - 2000 - Hyle 6 (2):117 - 142.
Boon and Bane: On the Role of Adjustable Parameters in Simulation Models.Hans Hasse & Johannes Lenhard - 2017 - In Martin Carrier & Johannes Lenhard (eds.), Mathematics as a Tool. Springer Verlag.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
On small differences in sensation.C. S. Peirce & Joseph Jastrow - 1884 - Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences 3:75-83.
A uniformly consistent estimator of causal effects under the k-Triangle-Faithfulness assumption.Peter Spirtes & Jiji Zhang - unknown
Introduction: Machine learning as philosophy of science.Kevin B. Korb - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (4):433-440.