Abstract

Greek philosophical tradition for the "good of the metaphysics" of the research can be divided into two mainstream: one dominated by Plato's "share ideas" in favor of all of the reasons there-and so came, all share the "good." Another view is mainly based on Aristotle's "nature point of view" in favor of the same "good" and "purpose." Therefore, the purpose of a natural entity, complete or perfect, that is completely unique ability to achieve its own, namely that the purpose of the entity, that entity is also good. However, both views hold a common view, namely, any exist are "good", this is the so-called "universal topic." Although with the same issues, and they still hold different views: the former think that every existence are sharing the goodness of God; the latter is considered a thing of the good, in terms of its self, has always been good . In other words, these two points were that the "good" on the one hand and generally beyond the scope of all the "inner" being there at all, on the one hand but the absolute perfection of God and "beyond" all there. The two opposing viewpoints in this under the link to exactly how to make compatible with each other and do not conflict, is to become the subject of this article. Because, once affirmed, "share ideas" naturally negative "nature of the point of view", and vice versa. Is, their ingenuity to Thomas Aquinas, "a priori good" place "sacred property" under the framework, and finally to resolve this problem. In this paper, Boye Brother "cycle theory" article in caused the problem, open this type of exploration on the problem. This paper describes how Thomas Aquinas from a different perspective, to "view nature," explained there and good relations. Then, on "sharing perspectives" will all have the perfection of goodness and divine absolute, linked together, there is one solution to the shape and the good over the years on this problem