Online Deliberation and #CivicTech: A Symposium

, &
Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17 (1):76-77 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Online deliberation is one important instance of civic tech that is both for and by the citizens, through engaging citizens in Internet-supported deliberative discussions on public issues. This article explains the origins of a set of symposium articles in this journal issue based on the 2017 'International Conference on Deliberation and Decision Making: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Civic Tech' held in Singapore. Symposium articles are presented in a sequence that flows from designing decision making systems to platforms to specific technological nudges.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Worldwide deliberation and public use of reason online.May Thorseth - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):243-252.
Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence.Todd Davies & Reid Chandler - 2012 - In Tina Nabatchi, John Gastil, G. Michael Weiksner & Matt Leihninger (eds.), Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 103-131.
Political Parties Online: Digital Democracy as Reflected in Three Dutch Political Party Web Sites.Liza Tsaliki, Nicholas W. Jankowski & Martine Van Selm - 2002 - Communications 27 (2):189-209.
Emotions and Digital Well-being. The rationalistic bias of social media design in online deliberations.Lavinia Marin & Sabine Roeser - 2020 - In Christopher Burr & Luciano Floridi (eds.), Ethics of digital well-being: a multidisciplinary approach. Springer. pp. 139-150.
Digital Democracy: Episode IV—A New Hope*: How a Corporation for Public Software Could Transform Digital Engagement for Government and Civil Society.John Gastil & Todd Davies - 2020 - Digital Government: Research and Practice (DGOV) 1 (1):Article No. 6 (15 pages).
Anonymity and Asynchronicity as Key Design Dimensions for the Reciprocity of Online Democratic Deliberation.Leandro De Brasi & Claudio Gutierrez - 2020 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2):183-200.
Learning in Democracy: Deliberation and Activism as Forms of Education.Rachel Wahl - 2019 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 38 (5):517-536.
Democratic Deliberation and Impartial Justice.Kaisa Herne & Setälä - 2015 - Res Cogitans 10 (1).
Deliberative Democracy and Constitutions.James S. Fishkin - 2011 - Social Philosophy and Policy 28 (1):242-260.
Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World: The Systemic Turn.Jonathan Kuyper - 2015 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 27 (1):49-63.
Matters of Deliberative Democracy: Is Conversation the Soul of Democracy?Maria Corina Barbaros - 2015 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 7 (1):143-165.
When the Forum Meets Interest Politics: Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation.Carolyn M. Hendriks - 2006 - Politics and Society 34 (4):571-602.
Incommunicative Action: An Esoteric Warning About Deliberative Democracy.Geoffrey M. Vaughan - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2-3):293-309.
Pictures of Politics.Bert van den Brink - 2012 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 98 (3):396-410.
Deliberation and agreement.Christian List - 2008 - In Shawn W. Rosenberg (ed.), Can the People Govern? Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-30

Downloads
294 (#66,320)

6 months
99 (#40,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Todd Davies
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references