Journal of Business Ethics 135 (2):341-360 (2016)
Abstract |
As forms of private self-regulation, multi-stakeholder initiatives have emerged as an important empirical phenomenon in global governance processes. At the same time, MSIs are also theoretically intriguing because of their inherent double nature. On the one hand, MSIs spell out CSR standards that define norms for corporate behavior. On the other hand, MSIs are also the result of corporate and stakeholder behavior. We combine the perspectives of institutional theory and club theory to conceptualize this double nature of MSIs. Based on a stage model that looks at the interplay of actor and institutional dynamics, we generate insights into why actors join a voluntary MSI, how the various motivations and intentions of the actors influence the standard development, and how these as well as the MSI design are subsequently influenced by both external and internal dynamics.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10551-014-2468-1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives.Sébastien Mena & Guido Palazzo - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3):527-556.
The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council.Steffen Böhm, André Spicer & Sandra Moog - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 128 (3):469-493.
Learning From Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management.Julia Roloff - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (1):233-250.
United Nations Global Compact: The Promise–Performance Gap.S. Prakash Sethi & Donald H. Schepers - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 122 (2):1-16.
Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.David Strang & John W. Meyer - 1993 - Theory and Society 22 (4):487-511.
View all 15 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Contestation in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Enhancing the Democratic Quality of Transnational Governance.Daniel Arenas, Laura Albareda & Jennifer Goodman - 2020 - Business Ethics Quarterly 30 (2):169-199.
Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships.Domenico Dentoni, Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 150 (2):333-356.
Conceptualizing Data‐Deliberation: The Starry Sky Beetle, Environmental System Risk, and Habermasian CSR in the Digital Age.Mario D. Schultz & Peter Seele - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (2):303-313.
The Rawlsian Critique of Utilitarianism: A Luhmannian Interpretation.Vladislav Valentinov - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 142 (1):25-35.
Southern sustainability initiatives in agricultural value chains: a question of enhanced inclusiveness? The case of Trustea in India.Verena Bitzer & Alessia Marazzi - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 38 (2):381-395.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Institutional Implications for Stakeholder Modelling: Looking at Institutions in a Centralised Economy. [REVIEW]Oana Apostol & Salme Näsi - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):33-38.
Global Multi-Stakeholder Standard Setters: How Fragile Are They?Magnus Boström & Kristina Tamm Hallström - 2013 - Journal of Global Ethics 9 (1):93-110.
Decentered Stakeholder Theory: Toward a Research Agenda.Dominic Kaeslin, Ruth Schmitt & Jerry Calton - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:448-452.
E Pluribus Unum? Legitimacy Issues and Multi-Stakeholder Codes of Conduct.Valentina Mele & Donald H. Schepers - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3):561-576.
The German Family Panel. Research Potential and First Results of a Multi-Disciplinary Longitudinal Study on Partnership and Family Dynamics in Germany.Sabine Keller & Bernhard Nauck - 2013 - Analyse & Kritik 35 (2):321-339.
Sustainable Development and Industry Self-Regulation.Jennifer Griffin - 2014 - Business and Society 53 (4):551-582.
A Web of Watchdogs: Stakeholder Media Networks and Agenda-Setting in Response to Corporate Initiatives.Maria Besiou, Mark Lee Hunter & Luk N. Van Wassenhove - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 118 (4):709-729.
Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy.Adele Santana - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
The Role of Dynamics in Stakeholder Thinking.Duane Windsor - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (S1):79-87.
Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives.Sébastien Mena & Guido Palazzo - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3):527-556.
The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council.Steffen Böhm, André Spicer & Sandra Moog - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 128 (3):469-493.
Stakeholders' Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development. [REVIEW]Michaela A. Balzarova & Pavel Castka - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):265-279.
A Life Cycle Model of Multi-Stakeholder Networks.Julia Roloff - 2008 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 17 (3):311–325.
Strategic Direction of Corporate Community Involvement.Gordon Liu, Teck-Yong Eng & Wai-Wai Ko - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3):469-487.
An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications. [REVIEW]Krista Bondy, Jeremy Moon & Dirk Matten - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):281-299.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-09-03
Total views
16 ( #668,644 of 2,519,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,442 )
2015-09-03
Total views
16 ( #668,644 of 2,519,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads