Review of Metaphysics 74 (294):251-288 (2020)

Authors
Vasfi Onur Özen
University of Kansas
Abstract
The general attitude towards Arthur Schopenhauer’s metaphysics is rather fiercely critical and at times even tendentious. It seems that the figure of Schopenhauer as an irredeemably flawed, stubborn, and contradictory philosopher serves as a leitmotiv among scholars. Schopenhauer’s identification of the thing-in-itself with the will continues to be a thorny puzzle in the secondary literature, and it presents perhaps the greatest challenge to Schopenhauer scholars. Schopenhauer borrows the term ‘thing-in-itself’ from Immanuel Kant, who uses it to refer to a reality that is distinct from what appears to us, and hence unknowable. Despite the fact that several interpretations have been offered to make sense of Schopenhauer’s identification of the thing-in-itself with the will, there appears to be no consensus about how to interpret this identification as well as his understanding of the term ‘thing-in-itself’. Unlike the other interpretations, the interpretation that I offer here distinguishes between three distinct and mutually incompatible views that Schopenhauer formulates about the thing-in-itself. I argue that it is not only difficult to give a coherent, consistent account of Schopenhauer’s position, but also not worth trying, because such an endeavor comes at the cost of ignoring the textual richness and depth of thought that Schopenhauer’s works offer.
Keywords Schopenhauer  Thing-in-itself  Kant  Fichte  Feeling  Will
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Schopenhauer's Metaphysics of the Will.Gilbert L. Shepard - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Shopenhauer’s Uncertainty.Michael Yuen - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 75:257-262.
Schopenhauer’s Two Metaphysics.Alistair Welchman - 2017 - In Sandra Shapshay (ed.), Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 129-149.
Schopenhauer’s Moral Philosophy.Alistair Welchman - 2017 - In Jens Timmerman & Sacha Golob (eds.), The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 448-58.
Did Schopenhauer Neglect the 'Neglected Alternative' Objection?Sandra Shapshay - 2011 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (3):321-348.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-07

Total views
151 ( #72,970 of 2,462,436 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #11,097 of 2,462,436 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes