Insufficient support for either response “priming” or “program-level imitation”

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):708-709 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Byrne & Russon propose that priming can account for the imitation of simple actions, but they fail to explain how the behavior of another can prime the observer's own behavior. They also propose that imitation of complex skills requires a sequence of acts tied together by a program, but they fail to rule out the role of trial-and-error learning and perceptual/motivational mechanisms in such task acquisition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

When actions are carved at the joints.Merideth Gattis, Harold Bekkering & Andreas Wohlschläger - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):691-692.
How imitators represent the imitated: The vital experiments.Andrew Whiten - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):707-708.
A Piagetian view of imitation.Harold D. Fishbein - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):689-690.
Mechanisms of imitation: The relabeled story.Herbert L. Roitblat - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):701-702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Primate Culture and Social Learning.Andrew Whiten - 2000 - Cognitive Science 24 (3):477-508.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references