Logique Et Analyse 54 (216) (2011)

Authors
Dan Zeman
University of Warsaw
Abstract
In this paper I investigate certain issues that have surfaced in the debate between truth-conditional semantics and truth-conditional pragmatics about meteorological sentences like "It is raining". First, I assess two criteria for unarticulatedness pertaining to the views (the Binding Criterion and the Optionality Criterion) and argue that both fail. Then I present one of the most powerful arguments against truth-conditional pragmatics: the so-called "Binding Argument". I show how the solution offered by Francois Recanati, consisting in appeal to "variadic functions", deflects the argument and that it can be adopted by a relativist abut locations too. In the end of a the paper I suggest, with focus on predicates of personal taste, that relativists about other kinds of expressions can adopt Recanati's solution to block versions of the Binding Argument directed at their view.
Keywords unarticulated constituents  binding  truth-conditional semantics  truth-conditional pragmatics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,916
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Unarticulated Constituents.François Recanati - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):299-345.
The First-Order Syntax of Variadic Functions.Samuel Alexander - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (1):47-59.
Temporal Metaphysics in Z-Land.Simon Prosser - 2006 - Synthese 149 (1):77 - 96.
What Unarticulated Constituents Could Not Be.Lenny Clapp - 2002 - In Joseph K. Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. pp. 231--256.
On Phrasal Pragmatics and What is Descriptively Referred To.Esther Romero & Belén Soria - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):63-84.
Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents.John Perry - 1998 - In Atocha Aliseda-Llera, Rob J. Van Glabbeek & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI-Armsterdam Logic, Language and Computation Conference. CSLI Publications.
Unarticulated Meaning.James Blachowicz - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (1):43 - 70.
Unarticulated Constituents Revisited.Luisa Martí - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (2):135 - 166.
Compositionality and Context.Peter Pagin - 2005 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 303-348.
The Myth of Unarticulated Constituents.Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2007 - In Michael O'Rourke & Corey Washington (eds.), Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry. MIT Press. pp. 199-214.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-29

Total views
24 ( #470,465 of 2,497,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,497,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes