More download options

Why Digital Pictures Are Not Notational Representations

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):449-453 (2015) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Categories

Analog and Digital Computation in Philosophy of Computing and Information

Criteria of Identity in Metaphysics

Depiction in Aesthetics

Relative Identity in Metaphysics

Keywords

Digital imagery Goodman Allographic

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/jaac.12203

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
Configure custom resolver

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

Digital Pictures, Sampling, and Vagueness: The Ontology of Digital Pictures.John Zeimbekis - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1):43-53.

Preserving the Autographic/Allographic Distinction.Jason D'cruz & P. D. Magnus - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):453-457.

Are Digital Images Allographic?Jason D'cruz & P. D. Magnus - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (4):417-427.

Escaping reality: Digital imagery and the resources of photography.Barbara E. Savedoff - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (2):201-214.

Blockchain Identities: Notational Technologies for Control and Management of Abstracted Entities.Quinn Dupont - 2017 - Metaphilosophy 48 (5):634-653.

Ontology and aesthetics of digital art.Paul Crowther - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):161–170.

Analog Representation Beyond Mental Imagery.James Blachowicz - 1997 - Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):55-84.

From point to pixel: a genealogy of digital aesthetics.Meredith Hoy - 2017 - Hanover, New Hampshire: Dartmouth College Press.

The vitality of digital creation.Timothy Binkley - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (2):107-116.

Zeimbekis, John, and Athanassios Raftopoulos, eds. The cognitive penetrability of perception: New philosophical perspectives. Oxford university press, 2015, 376 pp., 14 b&w illus., $99.00 cloth. [REVIEW]Sue Spaid - 2018 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (1):134-137.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-24

Downloads
670 (#37,725)

6 months
63 (#89,720)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Preserving the Autographic/Allographic Distinction.Jason D'cruz & P. D. Magnus - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):453-457.

Appearance and History: the Autographic/Allographic Distinction Revisited.Enrico Terrone - 2018 - British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (1):71-87.

The Density of Symbol Systems – A Critique of Nelson Goodman’s Notion.Krzysztof Guczalski - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (3):1131-1152.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Materialist Theory of the Mind.D. Armstrong - 1968 - Philosophical Quarterly 19 (74):73-79.

Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589-601.

The Structure of Appearance.Nelson Goodman - 1956 - Studia Logica 4:255-261.

Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Critica 4 (11/12):164-171.

Universals: An Opinionated Introduction.Jerrold Levinson & D. M. Armstrong - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (3):654.

View all 13 references / Add more references