Replicative forgery

Art and Cognition Workshops (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that there is no distinction between allographic and autographic representations. One consequence of this is that replicative forgeries have the same aesthetic and artistic value as originals, and are accurate records of actions. I end with some reflections on the pragmatic structure of forgery.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Appropriation and Authorship in Contemporary Art.Sherri Irvin - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):123-137.
Artistic crimes: The problem of forgery in the arts.Denis Dutton - 1979 - British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (4):302-314.
Forgery and the Corruption of Aesthetic Understanding.Sherri Irvin - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):283-304.
Goodman, forgery, and the aesthetic.Luise H. Morton & Thomas R. Foster - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (2):155-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-30

Downloads
740 (#19,537)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references