Biobanks and the Return of Research Results: Out with the Old and in with the New?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):614-620 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 2009, Time magazine named “biobanks” as one of the 10 ideas changing the world. These organized collections of human biological material and associated data have been identified as “vital research tools in the drive to uncover the consequences of human health and disease.” Since their inception, however, biobanks have faced ethical and legal challenges. Whether these pertain to informed consent, access by researchers, commercialization, confidentiality, or governance, biobanks must continue to address jurisdictional matters, operational difficulties, and normative frameworks that strive to stay abreast of current scientific innovation. Yet, with some biobanks now having completed their recruitment objectives and with research currently being performed on their data and samples, one topic has become the focus of ongoing debates: the return of research results to participants.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Return of Results: Towards a Lexicon?Bartha Maria Knoppers & Amy Dam - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):577-582.
Biobanks and feedback.Kadri Simm - 2014 - In Ruth Chadwick, Mairi Levitt & Darren Shickle (eds.), The Right to Know and the Right not to Know. Cambridge University Press. pp. 55-70.
The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
11 (#1,075,532)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?