Does Language Have an Essence? From Wittgenstein via Rhees to Brandom

Disputatio 8 (9) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ludwig Wittgenstein is widely known to have held the view that language has no essence, i.e. that no particular language game is more constitutive of our ability to speak than others. One of the first critical discussions opposing the stance that Wittgenstein had taken, was delivered by Rush Rhees in his “Wittgenstein’s Builders”. Rhees warns us against letting the metaphor of language as a game go too far, and thus “seduce” us —which supposedly happened to Wittgenstein. Instead, he argues that apart from different particular functions that language may serve, it has to have something that secures the unity of discourse and that can be called its essence. He sees this crucial element in “discourse” or “conversation”. In his justification of such a view, Rhees advances some hints, though not developed into a thorough elaboration, which may be read in an inferentialist spirit. Displaying such features as semantic holism, propositionalism, essentialism and —as the present paper suggests —a rudimentary version of inferentialism, Rhees’ deliberations tally with Brandom’s philosophical project. Thus, the paper is intended to analyse these features as a background for Brandom’s wider conception.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rhees on the Unity of Language.Lars Hertzberg - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (3-4):224-237.
Wittgenstein and the possibility of discourse.Rush Rhees - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by D. Z. Phillips.
Rush Rhees on Wittgenstein and “What Language Is”.Hugh A. Knott - 2013 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (3):228-245.
Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse.D. Z. Phillips (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
4 Playing well.David Egan - 2013 - In Emily Ryall (ed.), The Philosophy of Play. Routledge. pp. 54.
Discussions of Wittgenstein.Rush Rhees - 1970 - London,: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Discussions of Wittgenstein. [REVIEW]V. W. J. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):366-367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-14

Downloads
5 (#1,344,576)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tomasz Zarębski
University of Lower Silesia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references