Undivided and indistinguishable histories in branching-time logics

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):297-315 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the tree-like representation of Time, two histories are undivided at a moment t whenever they share a common moment in the future of t. In the present paper, it will first be proved that Ockhamist and Peircean branching-time logics are unable to express some important sentences in which the notion of undividedness is involved. Then, a new semantics for branching-time logic will be presented. The new semantics is based on trees endowed with an indistinguishability function, a generalization of the notion of undividedness. It will be shown that Ockhamist and Peircean semantics can be viewed as limit cases of the semantics developed in this paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#288,506)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Past, present and future.Arthur N. Prior - 1967 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Past, present, and future.Arthur Prior - 1967 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 157:476-476.
Branching space-time.Nuel Belnap - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):385 - 434.
Temporal Logic: From Ancient Ideas to Artificial Intelligence.Peter Øhrstrøm & Per F. V. Hasle - 1995 - Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

View all 11 references / Add more references