Formal natural beauty

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):209–224 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend moderate formalism about the aesthetics of nature. I argue that anti-formalists cannot account for the incongruousness of much natural beauty. This shows that some natural beauty is not kind-dependent. I then tackle several anti-formalist arguments that can be found in the writings of Ronald Hepburn, Allen Carlson, and Malcolm Budd.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
185 (#103,100)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nick Zangwill
University College London

Citations of this work

The Ethics of De-Extinction.Shlomo Cohen - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (2):165-178.
Beauty.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2019 - Oxford Bibliographies Online: Philosophy.
Sensory Force, Sublime Impact, and Beautiful Form.Eli I. Lichtenstein - 2019 - British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (4):449-464.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Categories of Art.Kendall L. Walton - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (3):334-367.
Nature and positive aesthetics.Allen Carlson - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (1):5-34.
Formal Qualities in the Natural Environment.Allen Carlson - 1979 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 13 (3):99.

Add more references