Using item response theory to investigate the structure of anticipated affect: do self-reports about future affective reactions conform to typical or maximal models?

, , &
Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01438

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Investigating the role of self-construal in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions.Leonidas A. Zampetakis, Konstantinos Kafetsios, Manolis Lerakis & Vassilis Moustakis - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Sharing personal information in relationships: the implications of anticipated response for information management theory and measurement.Kate Magsamen-Conrad - unknown
Harm, Affect and the Moral/Conventional Distinction: Revisited.Sydney Levine & David Rose - manuscript
Rationale for Considering Typical Critical Thinking Skills.Gordon D. Lamb & Cecil R. Reynolds - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):21-29.
Why Response-Dependence Theories of Morality are False.Jeremy Randel Koons - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):275-294.
The predictive validity of typical and maximal personality measures in self-reports and peer reports.Robert C. Klesges, Hugh Mcginley, Gregory J. Jurkovic & Thomas J. Morgan - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (6):401-404.
Drawing inferences about others' cognitions and affective reactions: A test of two models for representing affect.Rachel Karniol & Rachel Ben-Moshe' - 1991 - Cognition and Emotion 5 (4):241-253.
Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.Yoon Soo Park, Young-Sun Lee & Kuan Xing - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Future of Ethically Effective Leadership.Chaudhary Imran Sarwar - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):81-89.
Experimental studies of the judgmental theory of feeling: IV. Retention of the effects of learned reactions on affective judgments.H. N. Peters - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (2):111.
Experimental studies in affective processes: I. Some effects of cognitive structure and active participation on certain autonomic reactions during and following experimentally induced stress.E. A. Haggard - 1943 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (4):257.
How the Object of Affect Guides its Impact.Gerald L. Clore & Jeffrey R. Huntsinger - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (1):39-54.
Maximal Possibilities.David Sanson - manuscript
Experimental studies of the judgmental theory of feeling: I. Learning of positive and negative reactions as a determinant of affective judgments.H. N. Peters - 1938 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (1):1.
Do we know how happy we are? On some limits of affective introspection and recall.Daniel M. Haybron - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):394–428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A theory of data.C. H. Coombs - 1960 - Psychological Review 67 (3):143-159.

Add more references