Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Kristen Intemann. 2018. The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public [Book Review]

Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 35 (1):131-132 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann. The Fight against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap between Scientists and the Public.John Dupré - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (1):204-207.
Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann: The Fight Against Doubt—How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public: Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018, 232 pp, £25.99, ISBN: 9780190869229. [REVIEW]Tobias Schönwitz, David Hopf & Daria Jadreškić - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (1):203-206.
Review of Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann's The Fight Against Doubt. [REVIEW]John Dupre - forthcoming - Philosophy of Science.
Regulating scientific research: should scientists be left alone?Kristen Intemann & Inmaculada de Melo-Martin - 2008 - FASEB Journal 22 (3):654-58.
The Fight Against Doubt: How to Bridge the Gap Between Scientists and the Public.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín & Kristen Intemann - 2018 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Interpreting evidence.Inmaculada De Melo-Martín & KRIstEN INtEmANN - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (1):59-70.
Scientific dissent and public policy. Is targeting dissent a reasonable way to protect sound policy decisions?Inmaculada de Melo-Martin & Kristen Intemann - 2013 - EMBO Reports 14 (4):231-35.
Inductive Risk and Regulatory Toxicology: A Comment on de Melo-Martín and Intemann.Daniel J. Hicks - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (1):164-174.
Can ethical reasoning contribute to better epidemiology? A case study in research on racial health disparities.Inmaculada de Melo-Martin & Kristen Intemann - 2007 - European Journal of Epidemiology 22 (4):215-21.
Science at the Frontiers: Perspectives on the History and Philosophy of Science.Adam D. Roth, Anya Plutynski, Bridget Buxton, Steven C. Hatch, Sharyn Clough, Brian L. Keeley, Yuri Yamamoto, Lawrence Souder, Evelyn Brister, Kristen Intemann, Inmaculada de Melo-Martín & Glen Sanford - 2011 - Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
Are there limits to scientists' obligations to seek and engage dissenters?Kristen Intemann & Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2751-2765.
Who's Afraid of Dissent? Addressing Concerns about Undermining Scientific Consensus in Public Policy Developments.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín & Kristen Intemann - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (4):593-615.
The Risk of Using Inductive Risk to Challenge the Value-Free Ideal.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín & Kristen Intemann - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (4):500-520.
Interpreting Evidence: Why Values Can Matter As Much As Science.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín & Kristen Intemann - 2012 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (1):59-70.
Value-Free Science? [REVIEW]Kristen Intemann - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):143-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
9 (#1,187,161)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jesus Pedro Zamora Bonilla
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references