Ethics and the Beast: A Speciesist Argument for Animal Liberation

Princeton University Press (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many people think that animal liberation would require a fundamental transformation of basic beliefs. We would have to give up "speciesism" and start viewing animals as our equals, with rights and moral status. And we would have to apply these beliefs in an all-or-nothing way. But in Ethics and the Beast, Tzachi Zamir makes the radical argument that animal liberation doesn't require such radical arguments--and that liberation could be accomplished in a flexible and pragmatic way. By making a case for liberation that is based primarily on common moral intuitions and beliefs, and that therefore could attract wide understanding and support, Zamir attempts to change the terms of the liberation debate. Without defending it, Ethics and the Beast claims that speciesism is fully compatible with liberation. Even if we believe that we should favor humans when there is a pressing human need at stake, Zamir argues, that does not mean that we should allow marginal human interests to trump the life-or-death interests of animals. As minimalist as it sounds, this position generates a robust liberation program, including commitments not to eat animals, subject them to factory farming, or use them in medical research. Zamir also applies his arguments to some questions that tend to be overlooked in the liberation debate, such as whether using animals can be distinguished from exploiting them, whether liberationists should be moral vegetarians or vegans, and whether using animals for therapeutic purposes is morally blameless.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal Rights and Liberation Movements.David Lamb - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (3):215-233.
Is speciesism opposed to liberationism?Tzachi Zamir - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):465-475.
Animal rights: Autonomy and redundancy. [REVIEW]David Sztybel - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
The Analogical Argument for Animal Pain.Roy W. Perrett - 1997 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):49-58.
Foucault and the Ethics of Eating.Chloë Taylor - 2010 - Foucault Studies 9:71-88.
Ethics and the beast - by Tzachi Zamir.John Hadley - 2008 - Philosophical Books 49 (3):279-280.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
48 (#323,919)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references