Applied phenomenology: why it is safe to ignore the epoché

Continental Philosophy Review (2):1-15 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question of whether a proper phenomenological investigation and analysis requires one to perform the epoché and the reduction has not only been discussed within phenomenological philosophy. It is also very much a question that has been hotly debated within qualitative research. Amedeo Giorgi, in particular, has insisted that no scientific research can claim phenomenological status unless it is supported by some use of the epoché and reduction. Giorgi partially bases this claim on ideas found in Husserl’s writings on phenomenological psychology. In the present paper, I discuss Husserl’s ideas and argue that while the epoché and the reduction are crucial for transcendental phenomenology, it is much more questionable whether they are also relevant for a non-philosophical application of phenomenology.

Similar books and articles

Epoché and Teleology.Shojiro Kotegawa - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 19:41-48.
How to do things with brackets: the epoché explained.Søren Overgaard - 2015 - Continental Philosophy Review 48 (2):179-195.
Phenomenology and epoché.Renato da Martini - 1999 - Trans/Form/Ação 21 (1):43-51.
Nine Fragments on Psychological Phenomenology.Dorion Cairns - 2010 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 41 (1):1-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-09

Downloads
380 (#46,174)

6 months
99 (#34,298)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Zahavi
University of Copenhagen