- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is incremental validity too incremental in the long run? A commentary on Stoyanov D., Machamer P.K. & Schaffner, K.F. (2012) [Book Review]
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1):157-158 (2012)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-03
Downloads
41 (#368,129)
6 months
6 (#417,196)
2013-11-03
Downloads
41 (#368,129)
6 months
6 (#417,196)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The meta‐language of psychiatry as cross‐disciplinary effort: In response to Zachar (2012).Drozdstoj Stoyanov, Peter K. Machamer, Kenneth F. Schaffner & Rayito Rivera-Hernández - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3):710-720.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-67rzb uwo