Has there been Conceptual Progress in The Science of Emotion?

Emotion Review 2 (4):381-382 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Izard’s claim that the term emotion works well as an adjective is closer to B. F. Skinner’s position than is acknowledged. Based on Izard’s survey of scientists, I argue that the lack of consensus on emotion as a unitary construct could be considered to represent the dissolution of emotions. Given that something similar has happened in biology with the dissolution of the unitary gene construct, this development in psychology may not be as problematic as it initially sounds

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
43 (#362,182)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Zachar
Auburn University Montgomery

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

What's basic about basic emotions?Andrew Ortony & Terence J. Turner - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (3):315-331.
Genes in the postgenomic era.Paul E. Griffiths & Karola Stotz - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):499-521.
The classification of emotion and scientific realism.Peter Zachar - 2006 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 26 (1-2):120-138.
The elusive concept of the gene.Petter Portin - 2009 - Hereditas 146 (3):112-117.

View all 6 references / Add more references