Folk taxonomies should not have essences, either: a response to the commentary

Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 7 (3):191-194 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are folk taxonomies “memes”?Dan Sperber - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):589-590.
Folk taxonomies versus official taxonomies.Nick Haslam - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (3):pp. 281-284.
Clinicians' folk taxonomies of mental disorders.Elizabeth H. Flanagan Roger K. Blashfield - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (3):pp. 249-269.
Clinicians' “folk” taxonomies and the DSM: Pick your poison.G. Scott Waterman - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (3):pp. 271-275.
Clinicians' Folk Taxonomies of Mental Disorders.Elizabeth H. Flanagan & Roger K. Blashfield - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (3):249-269.
Folk metaphysics and the anthropology of science.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):573-574.
On Bloom’s Taxonomies of Educational Objectives.Gregory Mellema - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:439-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
25 (#614,662)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Zachar
Auburn University Montgomery

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references