Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):148-149 (2005)
AbstractOur computational studies of infant language learning estimate the inherent difficulty of Arbib's proposal. We show that body language provides a strikingly helpful scaffold for learning language that may be necessary but not sufficient, given the absence of sophisticated language in other species. The extraordinary language abilities of Homo sapiens must have evolved from other pressures, such as sexual selection.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Language and Life History: A New Perspective on the Development and Evolution of Human Language.John L. Locke & Barry Bogin - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):259-280.
Nietzsche on Language, Consciousness, and the Body.Christian Emden - 2005 - University of Illinois Press.
Language Learning in Infancy: Does the Empirical Evidence Support a Domain Specific Language Acquisition Device?Christina Behme & Helene Deacon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):641 – 671.
Language Evolution Without Evolution.Derek Bickerton - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):669-670.
Symbol Grounding and the Symbolic Theft Hypothesis.Angelo Cangelosi, Alberto Greco & Stevan Harnad - 2002 - In A. Cangelosi & D. Parisi (eds.), Simulating the Evolution of Language. Springer Verlag. pp. 191--210.
Symposium on “A Multi-Methodological Approach to Language Evolution”: Introductory Article: Studying the Evolution of Language: A Multi-Methodological Enterprise.Angelo Cangelosi - 2008 - Mind and Society 7 (1):35-41.
Language Use, Not Language, is What Develops in Childhood and Adolescence.Derek Bickerton - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):280-281.
Mothering Plus Vocalization Doesn't Equal Language.Derek Bickerton - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):504-505.
Language Learning, Power Laws, and Sexual Selection.Ted Briscoe - 2008 - Mind and Society 7 (1):65-76.