Alice Young, B. R. Woods, Tamara Welschot, Dan Wainstock, Kaoru Sakabe, Kenneth D. Pimple, Charon A. Pierson, Kelly Perry, Jennifer K. Nyborg, Barb Houser, Anna Keith, Ferric Fang, Arthur M. Buchberg, Lyndon Branfield, Monica Bradford, Catherine Bens, Jeffrey Beall, Laura Bandura-Morgan, Noémie Aubert Bonn & Carolyn J. Broccardo
Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1) (2018)
Abstract |
The progression of research and scholarly inquiry does not occur in isolation and is wholly dependent on accurate reporting of methods and results, and successful replication of prior work. Without mechanisms to correct the literature, much time and money is wasted on research based on a crumbling foundation. These guidelines serve to outline the respective responsibilities of researchers, institutions, agencies, and publishers or editors in maintaining the integrity of the research record. Delineating these complementary roles and proposing solutions for common barriers provide a foundation for best practices.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1186/s41073-018-0055-1 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity.Lex Bouter - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4):2363-2369.
Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Ethical Responsibilities of Nanotechnology Researchers: A Short Guide. [REVIEW]Robert McGinn - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (1):1-12.
Commentary on “Six Domains of Research Ethics”.Sheila Slaughter - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):219-222.
The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.David Shaw - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1085-1093.
Commentary: A Broader Perspective on the RePAIR Consensus Guidelines.Zoë H. Hammatt - 2018 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1).
How Do Researchers Acquire and Develop Notions of Research Integrity? A Qualitative Study Among Biomedical Researchers in Switzerland.Priya Satalkar & David Shaw - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-12.
Correcting the Scholarly Record for Research Integrity: In the Aftermath of Plagiarism.M. V. Dougherty - 2018 - Cham: Springer.
Critical Evaluation of the Guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity and of Their Application.Erja Moore & Liisa Räsänen - 2016 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1).
Research Integrity Practices From the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers.Snežana B. Krstić - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1181-1196.
New COPE Guidelines on Publication Process Manipulation: Why They Matter.Jigisha Patel - 2018 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1).
Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement.Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Frank O. Anthun, Sharon Bailey, Giles Birchley, Henriette Bout, Carlo Casonato, Gloria González Fuster, Bert Heinrichs, Serge Horbach, Ingrid Skjæggestad Jacobsen, Jacques Janssen, Matthias Kaiser, Inge Lerouge, Barend van der Meulen, Sarah de Rijcke, Thomas Saretzki, Margit Sutrop, Marta Tazewell, Krista Varantola, Knut Jørgen Vie, Hub Zwart & Mira Zöller - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1023-1034.
Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement.Mira Zöller, Hub Zwart, Knut Vie, Krista Varantola, Marta Tazewell, Margit Sutrop, Thomas Saretzki, Sarah Rijcke, Barend Meulen, Inge Lerouge, Matthias Kaiser, Jacques Janssen, Ingrid Jacobsen, Serge Horbach, Bert Heinrichs, Gloria Fuster, Carlo Casonato, Henriette Bout, Giles Birchley, Sharon Bailey, Frank Anthun & Ellen-Marie Forsberg - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1023-1034.
Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?Aamir Memon - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5):1617-1639.
Addressing Research Integrity Challenges: From Penalising Individual Perpetrators to Fostering Research Ecosystem Quality Care.Ruud Meulen & Hub Zwart - 2019 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 15 (1):1-5.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-02-03
Total views
4 ( #1,277,327 of 2,504,602 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,529 of 2,504,602 )
2020-02-03
Total views
4 ( #1,277,327 of 2,504,602 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,529 of 2,504,602 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads