Moral agency and the unity of the world: The neo-confucian critique of "vulgar learning"

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (4):479-489 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6253.2006.00376.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Moral agency and the unity of the world: The neo-confucian critique of "vulgar learning".K. I. M. Youngmin - 2006 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33 (4):479–489.
Trouble with korean confucianism: Scholar-official between ideal and reality.Kim Sungmoon - 2009 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (1):29-48.
Dao Companion to Neo-Confucian Philosophy.John Makeham (ed.) - 2010 - New York: Springer.
Neo-Confucian Cosmology, Virtue Ethics, and Environmental Philosophy.Donald N. Blakeley - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (2):37-49.
"WHY BE MORAL?" The Cheng Brothers' neo-confucian answer.Yong Huang - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):321-353.
Essentials of contemporary Neo-Confucian philosophy.Shuxian Liu - 2003 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
The thought of Chang Tsai (1020-1077).Ira E. Kasoff - 1984 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Confucian moral realism.JeeLoo Liu - 2007 - Asian Philosophy 17 (2):167 – 184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
35 (#443,848)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references