Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2 (2):291-309 (2016)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Kant famously insists that free will is a condition of morality. The difficulty of providing a demonstration of freedom has left him vulnerable to devastating criticism: critics charge that Kant's post-Groundwork justification of morality amounts to a dogmatic assertion of morality's authority. My paper rebuts this objection, showing that Kant offers a cogent demonstration of freedom. My central claim is that the demonstration must be understood in practical rather than theoretical terms. A practical demonstration of x works by bringing x into existence, and what the demonstration of freedom brings into existence is a moral will, a will regulated by the moral law and capable of acting in accordance with it. Since to act morally is to act freely, bringing a moral will into existence actualizes our capacity for freedom and demonstrates that we possess it. To confirm the viability of such a demonstration, Kant must establish that agents can regulate their wills by practical principles, and that practical judgments are efficacious of themselves (i.e., that non-Humean motivational internalism is true). Kant, I argue, is successful on both counts.
|
Keywords | Kant agency free will history of philosophy metaphysics practical reasoning responsibility history of ethics |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/apa.2016.12 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy.John Rawls & Barbara Herman - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):178-179.
All or Nothing. Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Scepticism in German Idealism.Paul W. Franks - 2006 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68 (3):616-619.
View all 19 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant on Freedom of Empirical Thought.Markus Kohl - 2015 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (2):301-26.
Can We Interpret Kant as a Compatibilist About Determinism and Moral Responsibility?Ben Vilhauer - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):719 – 730.
The Cambridge Companion to Kant. [REVIEW]Bernard D. Freydberg - 1995 - History of European Ideas 21 (1):75-80.
Kant, History, and the Idea of Moral Development.Pauline Kleingeld - 1999 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (1):59-80.
Overcoming Kant's Legacy: Schopenhauer's Theories of Action, Will and Reason.Robert C. Horton - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Practical Reason and Kant's Historical Hope.Damian Gerard Konkoly - 2001 - Dissertation, Emory University
Freedom and Reason in Kant, Schelling, and Kierkegaard.Michelle Kosch - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Kant and the Value of Free Rational Activity.Jennifer K. Uleman - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
Two Approaches to Moral Responsibility : Part Two.Garrath Williams - 2004 - Richmond Journal of Philosophy 6:14-19.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-04-07
Total views
105 ( #110,072 of 2,498,775 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,446 of 2,498,775 )
2016-04-07
Total views
105 ( #110,072 of 2,498,775 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #118,446 of 2,498,775 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads