Moral Actions vs. Virtuous Characters: Hursthouse's Virtue Ethics and the Problem of Personal Transformation

Philosophical Studies (University of Tokyo) 26 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central argument of this article is that the standard conception of character given in virtue theory, as exemplified in the work of Rosalind Hursthouse, is seriously flawed. Partially, this is because looking behind a moral action for a ‘character’ is suspiciously akin to looking behind an object for an ‘essence’, and is susceptible to the same interpretive errors as an epistemic strategy. Alternately, a character—once inducted and projected upon a moral agent—is supposed to be a more or less permanent property of that individual; a schema which leaves little room for the real possibility of personal transformation. I argue here that what is often referred to in virtue literature as ‘character’ can be productively re-described as the aggregate of all moral actions performed by any one moral agent: nothing more, and nothing less. My hope is that this interpretive strategy will result in broader and more coherent readings of moral actions, and thus also clarify moral confusion resulting from the current lack of the same.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Can virtuous people emerge from tragic dilemmas having acted well?Liezl van Zyl - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):50–61.
Virtue and nature.Christopher W. Gowans - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):28-55.
Against Agent-Based Virtue Ethics.Michael S. Brady - 2004 - Philosophical Papers 33 (1):1-10.
Virtues, Skills, and Right Action.Matt Stichter - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):73-86.
Virtue Ethics and Right Action.Diana Courtney Fleming - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Right action and the non-virtuous agent.Liezl van Zyl - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):80-92.
Utilitarian Naturalism and the Moral Justification of Emotions.Kristján Kristjánsson - 2000 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):43-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-28

Downloads
185 (#95,645)

6 months
50 (#74,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations