Aboriginal overkill overstated

Human Nature 12 (2):141-167 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I critique Charles Kay’s aboriginal overkill hypothesis, which states that Native Americans numbered 100 million or more in precolumbian North America, extensively humanized the landscape, and suppressed wildlife numbers, thus allowing wildlife browse to proliferate. By examining Kay’s source use and pertinent information, I find that he makes four kinds of significant mistakes: exaggerations, failure to provide necessary data, errors of omission, and errors of logic. Through examples I illustrate that Kay’s errors compromise his hypothesis. Kay uses Yellowstone National Park as his primary example of such a humanized area; in contrast, I suggest it is a relatively pristine area

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aboriginal overkill.Charles E. Kay - 1994 - Human Nature 5 (4):359-398.
Biology and philosophy in yellowstone.Holmes Rolston - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (2):241-258.
Culture, landscape, and the environment.Kate Flint & Howard Morphy (eds.) - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Water-related aesthetic preferences of Wyoming residents.Gary D. Hampe - 1974 - Laramie: University of Wyoming, Water Resources Research Institute. Edited by Verne E. Smith & James Paul Mitchell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
11 (#976,244)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aboriginal overkill.Charles E. Kay - 1994 - Human Nature 5 (4):359-398.
Aboriginal overkill.Charles E. Kay - 1994 - Human Nature 5 (4):359-398.

Add more references