Noûs (forthcoming)

Authors
Gabriel Rabin
New York University, Abu Dhabi
Joshua Myers
New York University
Andrew Y. Lee
University of Oslo
Abstract
This paper develops a theory of analog representation. We first argue that the mark of the analog is to be found in the nature of a representational system’s interpretation function, rather than in its vehicles or contents alone. We then develop the rulebound structure theory of analog representation, according to which analog systems are those that use interpretive rules to map syntactic structural features onto semantic structural features. The theory involves three degree-theoretic measures that capture three independent ways in which a system can be more or less analog. We explain how our theory improves upon prior accounts of analog representation, provides plausible diagnoses for novel challenge cases, extends to hybrid systems that are partially analog and partially symbolic, and accounts for some of the advantages and disadvantages of representing analogically versus symbolically.
Keywords analog  analog representation  analog mirroring  symbolic  representation  interpretation function  iconic  rules  structure  representational systems  semantic fecundity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/nous.12404
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
Knowledge and the Flow of Information.F. Dretske - 1989 - Trans/Form/Ação 12:133-139.
New Work For a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - In D. H. Mellor & Alex Oliver (eds.), Properties. Oxford University Press.
Putnam’s Paradox.David Lewis - 1984 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):221 – 236.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analog Representations and Their Users.Matthew Katz - 2016 - Synthese 193 (3):851-871.
Analog and Digital Representation.Matthew Katz - 2008 - Minds and Machines 18 (3):403-408.
Analog and Digital, Continuous and Discrete.Corey J. Maley - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (1):117-131.
Analog Simulation.Russell Trenholme - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (1):115-131.
Analog Mental Representation.Jacob Beck - forthcoming - WIREs Cognitive Science.
Analog Representation and the Parts Principle.John Kulvicki - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (1):165-180.
Varieties of Analog and Digital Representation.Whit Schonbein - 2014 - Minds and Machines 24 (4):415-438.
Perception is Analog: The Argument From Weber's Law.Jacob Beck - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy 116 (6):319-349.
Computing and Modelling: Analog Vs. Analogue.Philippos Papayannopoulos - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 83:103-120.
Analog and Analog.John Haugeland - 1981 - Philosophical Topics 12 (1):213-226.
Chaotic Neurons and Analog Computation.Kazuyuki Aihara & Jun Kyung Ryeu - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):810-811.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-23

Total views
236 ( #46,418 of 2,499,414 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
127 ( #5,195 of 2,499,414 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes