Newcomb's paradox and Priest's principle of rational choice

Analysis 63 (3):237-242 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rational Choice and Expected Utility.Reed Brannon Richter - 1985 - Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
Two-Boxing is Irrational.Harold W. Noonan - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):455-462.
An Epistemic Principle Which Solves Newcomb's Paradox.Keith Lehrer & Vann McGee - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40 (1):197-217.
How braess' paradox solves newcomb's problem.A. D. Irvine - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (2):141 – 160.
Expected Utility, Ordering, and Context Freedom.Piers Rawling - 1997 - Economics and Philosophy 13 (1):79.
How braess' paradox solves newcomb's problem: Not!Louis Marinoff - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):217 – 237.
Benardete's Paradox.Michael B. Burke - 1999 - Sorites 11:82-85.
The Sequential Lottery Paradox.I. Douven - 2012 - Analysis 72 (1):55-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
22 (#690,757)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Byeong-uk Yi
University of Toronto, Mississauga

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rational dilemmas.G. Priest - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):11-16.

Add more references