Without God, everything is permitted? The reciprocal influence of religious and meta-ethical beliefs

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 58:95-100 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relation between religious and moral thought has been difficult to unravel because of the multifaceted nature of both religion and morality. We chose to study the belief dimension of religion and the meta-ethics dimension of morality and investigated the relation between God-related thoughts and objectivist/subjectivist morality in three studies. We expected a reciprocal relation between the idea of God and objective morality since God is one prominent way through which objective moral truths could be grounded and thus the lack of such objective truths might imply the absence of God who could set such truths. Study 1 revealed negative correlations between moral subjectivism and several measures of religious belief. Study 2 showed that people adopt moral objectivism more and moral subjectivism less after being implicitly primed with religious words in a sentence unscrambling task. Study 3 showed that people express less confidence about the existence of God after reading a persuasive text about the subjective nature of moral truths. Taken together, the results demonstrate that religious and meta-ethical beliefs are indeed related and can reciprocally influence each other.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral objectivism and a punishing God.Hagop Sarkissian & Mark Phelan - 2019 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 80:1-7.
Craig on God and Morality.Thomas W. Smythe & Michael Rectenwald - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):331-338.
God and the Basis of Morality.Kai Nielsen - 1982 - Journal of Religious Ethics 10 (2):335 - 350.
Religion and morality.Dewi Zephaniah Phillips (ed.) - 1996 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others.Geoffrey Goodwin & John M. Darley - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (1):250-256.
Atheism and Morality.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 89.
Better than our nature.Michael Vlerick - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-10

Downloads
17 (#819,600)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?