A bibliometric evaluation of the impact of theories of consciousness in academia and on social media

, &
Consciousness and Cognition 100 (C):103296 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.concog.2022.103296

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The epistemic impact of theorizing: generation bias implies evaluation bias.Finnur Dellsén - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (12):3661-3678.
Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometrics.Anthony van Raan - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 237-280.
The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.Gemma E. Derrick & Gabrielle N. Samuel - 2016 - Minerva 54 (1):75-97.
Social Media for a Philosopher.Markku Roinila - 2011 - New Apps Blog.
Does computing need to go beyond good and evil impacts?Randy Connolly & Alan Fedoruk - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):190-204.
On the evolution of the glass ceiling in Italian academia: the case of economics.Marcella Corsi, Carlo D’Ippoliti & Giulia Zacchia - 2019 - Science in Context 32 (4):411-430.
A study on journal self-citations and intra-citing within the subject category of multidisciplinary sciences.Jong Yong Abdiel Foo - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):491-501.
Social Media Metrics for New Research Evaluation.Paul Wouters, Zohreh Zahedi & Rodrigo Costas - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 687-713.
The Impact of Pandemic Perception, National Feeling, and Media Use on the Evaluation of the Performance of Different Countries in Controlling COVID-19 by Chinese Residents.Ruixia Han & Jian Xu - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands.Alexander Rushforth & Sarah de Rijcke - 2015 - Minerva 53 (2):117-139.
Evaluation Research in Public Health.Angela J. Dawson - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 333-354.
Revisiting the “Quiet Debut” of the Double Helix: A Bibliometric and Methodological note on the “Impact” of Scientific Publications.Yves Gingras - 2010 - Journal of the History of Biology 43 (1):159-181.
Theories of consciousness.David Papineau - 2003 - In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 353.
Mapping Gender Differences in Scientific Careers in Social and Bibliometric Space.Paula Mählck - 2001 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 26 (2):167-190.
Bibliometric Studies on Gender Disparities in Science.Gali Halevi - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 563-580.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
5 (#1,469,565)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two concepts of consciousness.David M. Rosenthal - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (May):329-59.
Why visual attention and awareness are different.Victor A. F. Lamme - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):12-18.
Towards a true neural stance on consciousness.Victor A. F. Lamme - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (11):494-501.

View all 14 references / Add more references