Dissolving type‐b physicalism

Philosophical Perspectives 31 (1):469-498 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The majority of physicalists are type-B physicalists – believing that the phenomenal-physical truths are only knowable a posteriori. This paper aims to show why this view is misguided. The strategy is to design an agent who (1) has full general physical knowledge, (2) has phenomenal concepts, and yet (3) is wired such that she would be in a position to immediately work out the phenomenal-physical truths. I argue that this derivation yields a priori knowledge. The possibility of such a creature entails that – contrary to type-B physicalism – there is not an ideal epistemic gap between the phenomenal and the physical truths. Out of this argument against type-B physicalism emerges a positive result: a new and compelling version of type-A physicalism, roughly a type-A phenomenal concept strategy.

Similar books and articles

Functionalism and token physicalism.Terence Horgan - 1984 - Synthese 59 (June):321-38.
Type Physicalism and Causal Exclusion.Joseph A. Baltimore - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:405-418.
What is token physicalism?Noa Latham - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):270-290.
Could a Classical Theist Be a Physicalist?William F. Vallicella - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):160-180.
Physicalism, Qualia and Mental Concepts.Diana I. Perez - 2002 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 17 (2):359-379.
Functionalism and type physicalism.Michael Tye - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (September):161-74.
Non-reductive physicalism?A. D. Smith - 1993 - In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
Is type identity incompatible with multiple realization?Michael Pauen - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 (1):37-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-26

Downloads
569 (#29,627)

6 months
118 (#28,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Yetter-Chappell
University of Miami

References found in this work

Does conceivability entail possibility.David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 145--200.
Consciousness and its place in nature.David Chalmers - 2003 - In Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell. pp. 102--142.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
The content and epistemology of phenomenal belief.David Chalmers - 2002 - In Aleksandar Jokic & Quentin Smith (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 220--72.

View all 30 references / Add more references