Language. Antinomy. Dialogue

Abstract

What is the nature of language? Does it exist as an ideal object, before and above verbal communication hic et nunc? Or, has it got its existence only within concrete speech acts, concrete communication? This century has witnessed ceaseless battles with innumerable supporters of either side of the argument. And no side has so far managed to completely defeat its rivals. Rather, both sides succeeded in pointing out the serious drawbacks and incompleteness in each other’s theoretical programmes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

On Putnam and his models.Timothy Bays - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (7):331-350.
On the way to language.Martin Heidegger - 1971 - San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Dialogue representation.Ruth Manor - 1984 - Topoi 3 (1):63-73.
Language and thought.Christopher Gauker - 1999 - A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
Idiolects and Language.Daniele Chiffi - 2012 - Axiomathes 22 (4):417-432.
In defense of public language.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2003 - In Louise M. Antony & H. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 215–237.
The antinomy of designation.Gordon Matheson - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (3):260-269.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2 (#1,634,744)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references