The insanity defence in the criminal laws of the commonwealth of nations


This article compares the M'Naghten Rules and some of the principal variations found in the Commonwealth of Nations for the purpose of formulating the best possible provision on the defence of insanity. The discussion is enhanced by evaluations of the concept of diminished responsibility operating in the Commonwealth, and of the provision on insanity in the Statute of the International Criminal Court.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,737

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Insanity and responsibility.Herbert Fingarette - 1972 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 15 (1-4):6 – 29.
Beyond Rational Insanity.Hung-Yul So - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:221-227.
Insanity and Criminal Responsibility.Sidney Gendin - 1973 - American Philosophical Quarterly 10 (2):99 - 110.
Book Review:The Commonwealth of Nations. L. Curtis. [REVIEW]J. M. - 1917 - International Journal of Ethics 27 (2):263-.
Criminal insanity.Herbert Morris - 1974 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 17 (1-4):345-355.
The moral foundations of the insanity defense.Thomas R. Litwack - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (1):12-19.
Commentary: Insanity defense reform.Orrin G. Hatch - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (2):2-88.
Failed Agency and the Insanity Defence.Steve Matthews - 2004 - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 27:413-424.


Added to PP

39 (#305,950)

6 months
1 (#482,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references