Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore

BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):6 (2017)

Abstract

A cross-sectional study to ascertain what the Singapore population would regard as material risk in the anaesthesia consent-taking process and identify demographic factors that predict patient preferences in medical decision-making to tailor a more patient-centered informed consent. A survey was performed involving patients 21 years old and above who attended the pre-operative evaluation clinic over a 1-month period in Singapore General Hospital. Questionnaires were administered to assess patients’ perception of material risks, by trained interviewers. Patients’ demographics were obtained. Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used. Statistical significance was taken at p < 0.05. Four hundred fourteen patients were eligible of which 26 refused to participate and 24 were excluded due to language barrier. 364 patients were recruited. A higher level of education, being employed and younger age group are factors identified in patients who wanted greater participation in medical decisions. Gender, marital status, type of surgery, and previous surgical history did not affect their level of participation. The complications most patients knew about were Nausea, Drowsiness and Surgical Wound Pain. Patients ranked Heart Attack, Death and Stroke as the most significant risks that they wanted to be informed about in greater detail. Most patients wanted to make a joint decision with the anaesthetist, instead of letting the doctor decide or deciding for themselves. Discussion with the anaesthetist is the preferred medium of communication compared to reading a pamphlet or watching a video. Age and educational level can influence medical decision-making. Despite the digital age, most patients still prefer a clinic consult instead of audio-visual multimedia for pre-operative anaesthetic counselling. The local population appears to place greater importance on rare but serious complications compared to common complications. This illustrates the need to contextualize information provided during informed consent to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-02

Downloads
16 (#672,224)

6 months
1 (#386,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gene Lin
University of Washington
Annalyssa Lee
Biola University
Jessnike Tan
University of Melbourne
1 more

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Process of Informed Consent for Urgent Abdominal Surgery.R. Kay - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):157-161.
Is Informed Consent Effective in Trauma Patients?A. Bhangu, E. Hood, A. Datta & S. Mangaleshkar - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):780-782.
The Value of Taking an 'Ethics History'.G. M. Sayers - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2):114-117.
Consent for Anaesthesia.S. M. White - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):286-290.
Beyond Informed Consent - Part II.Kate Jones - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 13 (2):6.