Regulatory Misconception Muddies the Ethical Waters: Challenges to a Qualitative Study
Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):217-220 (2012)
Abstract
In “Potential Subjects’ Responses to an Ethics Questionnaire in a Phase I Study of Deep-Brain Stimulation in Early Parkinson’s Disease,” Finder, Bliton, Gill, Davis, Konrad, and Charles undertake informed consent research on what they describe as a Phase I trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. We argue that the authors should have more carefully characterized the nature of the DBS study at the start of their clinical study.Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Potential subjects' responses to an ethics questionnaire in a phase I study of deep brain stimulation in early Parkinson's disease.Stuart G. Finder, Mark J. Bliton, Chandler E. Gill, Thomas L. Davis, Peter E. Konrad & P. D. Charles - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):207-216.
Fortitude and Community: Response to Yee and Ford.Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):221-223.
“I passed the test!” Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa.Francis Masiye, Bongani Mayosi & Jantina de Vries - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):12.
An Approach to Evaluating Therapeutic Misconception.Scott Y. H. Kim, Lauren Schrock, Renee M. Wilson, Samuel A. Frank, Robert G. Holloway, Karl Kieburtz & Raymond G. De Vries - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (5):7.
An approach to evaluating the therapeutic misconception.S. Y. Kim, L. Schrock, R. M. Wilson, S. A. Frank, R. G. Holloway, K. Kieburtz & R. G. Vries - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (5):7-14.
Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma.Felicitas Kraemer - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (12):757-760.
Unrealistic optimism and the ethics of phase I cancer research.Joshua Crites & Eric Kodish - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (6):403-406.
Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust.Inmaculada de Melo-Martin & A. Ho - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):202-205.
Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity.Karsten Witt, Jens Kuhn, Lars Timmermann, Mateusz Zurowski & Christiane Woopen - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (3):499-511.
Informed consent in clinical research in France: assessment and factors associated with therapeutic misconception.I. S. Durand-Zaleski, C. Alberti, P. Durieux, X. Duval, S. Gottot, P. Ravaud, S. Gainotti, C. Vincent-Genod, D. Moreau & P. Amiel - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e16-e16.
Doing What's Right: The Development of Research Ethics by Experienced Qualitative Researchers.Sandra Joyce Mace Gaston - 1998 - Dissertation, Texas a&M University
Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design: Table 1.Nir Lipsman, Peter Giacobbe, Mark Bernstein & Andres M. Lozano - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (2):107-111.
An embodied response: Ethics and the nurse researcher.Anne Clancy - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (1):112-121.
Experiences with community engagement and informed consent in a genetic cohort study of severe childhood diseases in Kenya.V. M. Marsh, D. M. Kamuya, A. M. Mlamba, T. N. Williams & S. S. Molyneux - 2010 - BMC Medical Ethics 11 (1):13-13.
Healthcare professionals' and researchers' understanding of cancer genetics activities: a qualitative interview study.N. Hallowell, S. Cooke, G. Crawford, M. Parker & A. Lucassen - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):113-119.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-15
Downloads
55 (#216,470)
6 months
11 (#82,900)
2013-12-15
Downloads
55 (#216,470)
6 months
11 (#82,900)
Historical graph of downloads
