Belief Changes and Cognitive Development: Doxastic Logic $${\mathsf {LCB}}$$

Axiomathes 31 (2):157-171 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present the logic $${\mathsf {LCB}}$$ LCB which is expressed in a propositional language constantly enriched by new atomic expressions. Our formal framework is the propositional doxastic logic $${\mathsf {KD45}}$$ KD 45 with the belief operator $${\mathcal {B}}$$ B, extended by the $${\mathcal {C}}$$ C operator, to be read it changes that.... We describe the changing beliefs of an agent who uses progressively expanding language. The approach presented here allows us to weaken pragmatic objections to the so-called principle of negative retrospection accepted in $${\mathsf {KD45}}$$ KD 45 and the problem of logical omniscience. In what follows, we present the expanding propositional language used in our formalism, interpreted using an epistemic version of Kripke semantics. Next, we give a syntactic characterization of logic $${\mathsf {LCB}}$$ LCB and prove the soundness and completeness of $${\mathsf {LCB}}$$ LCB in respect to our semantics. Finally, we compare the idea of expanding language with the notion of agent awareness and we relate our formalism to two epistemic temporal logics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-Fregean Propositional Logic with Quantifiers.Joanna Golińska-Pilarek & Taneli Huuskonen - 2016 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 57 (2):249-279.
Bounded Martin’s Maximum with an Asterisk.David Asperó & Ralf Schindler - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (3):333-348.
Faith, Belief and Fictionalism.Finlay Malcolm & Michael Scott - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (S1):257-274.
Moore’s Paradox, Introspection and Doxastic Logic.Adam Rieger - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):215-227.
A Nonstandard Counterpart of WWKL.Stephen G. Simpson & Keita Yokoyama - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (3):229-243.
Doxastic Logic.Michael Caie - 2019 - In Jonathan Weisberg & Richard Pettigrew (eds.), The Open Handbook of Formal Epistemology. PhilPapers Foundation. pp. 499-541.
On Interpretability in the Theory of Concatenation.Vítězslav Švejdar - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (1):87-95.
Boulesic-Doxastic Logic.Daniel Rönnedal - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (3):83-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-28

Downloads
14 (#965,243)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

First-Order Logic of Change.Kordula Świętorzecka - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An introduction to modal logic.G. E. Hughes - 1968 - London,: Methuen. Edited by M. J. Cresswell.
An Introduction to Modal Logic.George Edward Hughes & M. J. Cresswell - 1968 - London, England: Methuen. Edited by M. J. Cresswell.
Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning.Ronald Fagin & Joseph Y. Halpern - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 34 (1):39-76.
Some calculus for a logic of change.Kordula Świetorzecka & Johannes Czermak - 2012 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 22 (1-2):3-10.

Add more references