"The Philosophy of Theater"

Oxford Bibliographies (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theater—i.e., traditional text-based theater—is often considered the art form that most closely resembles lived life: real bodies in space play out a story through the passage of time. Because of this, theater (or theatre) has long been a laboratory of, and for, philosophical thought and reflection. The study of philosophy and theater has a history that dates back to, and flourished in, ancient Greece and Rome. While philosophers over the centuries have revisited the study of theater, the past four decades in particular have seen a noted and substantial increase of scholarship investigating this intersection between philosophy and theater. “Philosophy of theater” is, on one hand, a “field” that is just starting to take shape and is barely over a decade old; on another hand, it is a recognized subfield both of aesthetics and of theater and performance studies. And finally, it is also an amorphous concept, either not yet fleshed out, or intentionally amorphous and proudly organic. Philosophy of theater is also sometimes referred to—or is argued to be subsumed, more broadly, in—“performance philosophy,” which also refers to a network of academics and practitioners that publishes a book series and a journal of the same name. Regardless of what it is called or how it is classified, scholarship has coalesced around some fundamental preoccupations, which are not too dissimilar to questions that arise in other philosophies of. . . (e.g., art, film, dance, etc.). The debates in philosophy of theater mostly fall into three of the main branches of philosophy: metaphysics, epistemology, and aesthetics. The major metaphysical debates center on an ontological question: What is theater? Epistemological studies tend to focus on audience reception and/or how meaning is made and/or transmitted. Finally, studies in aesthetics focus on two main questions: (1) What is theater as an art form? (2) What is the relationship between dramatic text and theatrical performance? This article is intentionally narrow in its scope, focusing on philosophy and theater traditions that came out of Greek theater and philosophy, in order to ensure a sufficient amount of depth, not (merely) breadth.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commentary.A. A. Mitiushin - 1989 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 28 (3):89-91.
The Art of Theater.James R. Hamilton (ed.) - 2007 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Theater as Art.G. Shpet - 1989 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 28 (3):61-88.
Theater as Government.Athenaide Dallett - 1996 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Reading the Material Theatre.Ric Knowles - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-25

Downloads
57 (#251,825)

6 months
18 (#105,271)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Fsadf Fdsaf
University of York
Michael Y. Bennett
University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references