Privacy and data privacy issues in contemporary china

Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):7-15 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent anthropological analyses of Chinese attitudes towards privacy fail to pay adequate attention to more ordinary, but more widely shared ideas of privacy – ideas that, moreover, have changed dramatically since the 1980s as China has become more and more open to Western countries, cultures, and their network and computing technologies. I begin by reviewing these changes, in part to show how contemporary notions of privacy in China constitute a dialectical synthesis of both traditional Chinese emphases on the importance of the family and the state and more Western emphases on individual rights, including the right to privacy. This same synthesis can be seen in contemporary Chinese law and scholarship regarding privacy. A review of recent work in philosophical ethics demonstrates that information ethics in China is in its very early stages. In this work, privacy is justified as an instrumental good, rather than an intrinsic good. I argue by way of conclusion that privacy protections will continue to expand in China, in part under the pressures of globalization, increasing trade with and exposure to Western societies, and the increasing demands for Western-style individual privacy by young people. Even so, I argue that these emerging conceptions of privacy will remain distinctively Chinese – i.e., they will retain a basic consistency with traditional Chinese values and approaches.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The importance of privacy revisited.Norman Mooradian - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):163-174.
Four challenges for a theory of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (3):109–119.
Is there a right to privacy?Steven Davis - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (4):450-475.
Privacy. An intercultural perspective.Rafael Capurro - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (1):37-47.
Privacies: philosophical evaluations.Beate Rössler (ed.) - 2004 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#222,759)

6 months
7 (#175,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ethical pluralism and global information ethics.Charles Ess - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):215-226.
Intercultural information ethics.Rafael Capurro - 2008 - In Elizabeth A. Buchanan (ed.), Case Studies in Library and Information Science Ethics. Mcfarland & Co.. pp. 10.
Critically engaging the ethics of AI for a global audience.Samuel T. Segun - 2021 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (2):99-105.
Floridi and Spinoza on global information ethics.Soraj Hongladarom - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):175-187.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The scope of privacy in law and ethics.Judith Wagner Decew - 1986 - Law and Philosophy 5 (2):145-173.

Add more references