From intimidation to love: Taoist philosophy and love-based environmental education

Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (11):1117-1129 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For decades, a review of environmental education initiatives in and beyond schools indicates that many of them were implemented from an anthropocentric perspective. The rationale behind them is often that we must not destroy the environment because doing so is harmful for ourselves, human beings. One striking feature of the various forms of environmental education is the use of fear as a motivator, as people are warned about the frightening consequences of environmental destruction on their life. While this type of fear-based environmental education may be effective to some extent, intimidation cannot be a fundamental solution to environmental issues. We need to form a loving relationship with nature, through love-based environmental education. From intimidation to love, love-based environmental education focuses on enhancing public environmental awareness through inculcating love, respect, and gratitude toward nature, thereby helping to solve present and future environmental problems and construct an eco-friendly world.Love-based environmental education is richly embedded in Eastern philosophies such as Taoism and contemporary Western eco-ethics. In this article, we synthesize the tenets of love-based environmental education mainly through the lens of Taoist philosophy, discuss implementation approaches, and explore contemplative methods to cultivate connection with nature. Finally, we point out fear-based and love-based environmental education are not mutually exclusive. We need a combination of, or a diversity of approaches to ensure that we effectively change attitudes and behaviors of people.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Which One is the Real One?Anthony J. Graybosch - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):365-384.
Love’s Vision.Troy Jollimore - 2011 - Princeton University Press.
Self Love.[author unknown] - 2005 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:129-152.
Love: a history.Simon May - 2011 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
Self Love.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:129-152.
The Dance of Love.Peter Murphy - 2002 - Thesis Eleven 72 (1):65-90.
Love.Bennett W. Helm - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-16

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
9 (#298,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

A source book in Chinese philosophy.Wing-Tsit Chan - 1963 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press. Edited by Wing-Tsit Chan.
Biophilia.Edward O. Wilson (ed.) - 2009 - Harvard University Press.
A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy.A. C. Graham & Wing-Tsit Chan - 1964 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 84 (1):60.
Love.Bennett W. Helm - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 11 references / Add more references