Dependent and Independent Reasons

Informal Logic 13 (3) (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How are dependent (or linked) premises to be distinguished from independent (or convergent) premises? Deductive validity, sometimes proposed as a necessary condition for depende'nce, cannot be, for the premises of both inductive and deductive but invalid arguments can be dependent. The question is really this: When do multiple premises for a certain conclusion fonn one argument for that conclusion and when do they form multiple arguments? Answer: Premises are dependent when the evidence they offer for their conclusion is more than the ordinary sum of their probabilities. Ordinary sums are defined in the paper

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hybrid Arguments.Mark Vorobej - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).
Diagramming Objections To Independent Premises.Cathal Woods - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (2):139-151.
Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
Inductive Logic.Franz Huber - 2008 - In J. Lachs R. Talisse (ed.), Encyclopedia of American Philosophy. Routledge.
Logical Consequence.J. C. Beall, Greg Restall & Gil Sagi - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Deductive/Inductive Distinction.George Bowles - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3):159-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-26

Downloads
74 (#232,738)

6 months
15 (#304,480)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?