Ethics and Information Technology 23 (4):611-623 (2021)

Over the years, companies have adopted hiring algorithms because they promise wider job candidate pools, lower recruitment costs and less human bias. Despite these promises, they also bring perils. Using them can inflict unintentional harms on individual human rights. These include the five human rights to work, equality and nondiscrimination, privacy, free expression and free association. Despite the human rights harms of hiring algorithms, the AI ethics literature has predominantly focused on abstract ethical principles. This is problematic for two reasons. First, AI principles have been criticized for being vague and not actionable. Second, the use of vague ethical principles to discuss algorithmic risks does not provide any accountability. This lack of accountability creates an algorithmic accountability gap. Closing this gap is crucial because, without accountability, the use of hiring algorithms can lead to discrimination and unequal access to employment opportunities. This paper makes two contributions to the AI ethics literature. First, it frames the ethical risks of hiring algorithms using international human rights law as a universal standard for determining algorithmic accountability. Second, it evaluates four types of algorithmic impact assessments in terms of how effectively they address the five human rights of job applicants implicated in hiring algorithms. It determines which of the assessments can help companies audit their hiring algorithms and close the algorithmic accountability gap.
Keywords Artificial Intelligence  Machine Learning  Human Resources  Human Rights  Impact Assessments  Hiring Algorithms
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10676-021-09599-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Equality of Opportunity.Richard Arneson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.United Nations - 2009 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 21 (1-2):153-160.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Challenging Biased Hiring Algorithms.Aislinn Kelly-Lyth - 2021 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 41 (4):899-928.
Bearing Account-Able Witness to the Ethical Algorithmic System.Daniel Neyland - 2016 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 41 (1):50-76.
Democratizing Algorithmic Fairness.Pak-Hang Wong - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 33 (2):225-244.
History, Human Rights, and Globalization.Sumner B. Twiss - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (1):39-70.
Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence: Reconciling Human Rights with Legal Rights of Robots.Ammar Younas & Rehan Younas - forthcoming - In Zhyldyzbek Zhakshylykov & Aizhan Baibolot (eds.), Quality Time 18. Bishkek: International Alatoo University Kyrgyzstan. pp. 25-28.
Ethical Implications and Accountability of Algorithms.Kirsten Martin - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (4):835-850.


Added to PP index

Total views
736 ( #10,308 of 2,518,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
368 ( #1,103 of 2,518,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes