The emergence of kind concepts: a rejoinder to Needham and Baillargeon

Cognition 74 (3):285-301 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Strong and weak emergence.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Philip Clayton & Paul Davies (eds.), The re-emergence of emergence: the emergentist hypothesis from science to religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
How properties emerge.Paul Humphreys - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (1):1-17.
Referring to Natural Kind Thingamajigs, and What They Are: A Reply to Needham.Alexander Bird - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):103-109.
The plurality of concepts.Daniel Aaron Weiskopf - 2009 - Synthese 169 (1):145-173.
Beyond Darwinism’s Eclipse: Functional Evolution, Biochemical Recapitulation and Spencerian Emergence in the 1920s and 1930s. [REVIEW]Rony Armon - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):173 - 194.
Why Don't Concepts Constitute a Natural Kind?Richard Samuels & Michael Ferreira - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):222 - 223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
25 (#542,984)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?