A computational model for measuring discourse complexity

Discourse Studies 21 (6):690-712 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In past studies, the few quantitative approaches to discourse structure were mostly confined to the presentation of the frequency of discourse relations. However, quantitative approaches should take into account both hierarchical and relational layers in the discourse structure. This study considers these factors and addresses the issue of how discourse relations and discourse units are related. It draws upon the available corpora of discourse structure ) from a new perspective. Since an RST tree can be converted into a syntactic dependency tree, the data extracted from the RST-DT can be useful for calculating the discourse distance in much the same way as syntactic dependency distance is calculated. Discourse distance is also applicable to measuring the depth of the human processing of discourse. Furthermore, the data derived from the RST-DT are also easily converted into network data. This study finds that discourse structure has its discourse distance minimum and each type of RST relations has its range of discourse distance. The frequency distribution of discourse data basically follows the power law on several levels, while a network approach reveals how discourse units are arranged spatially in regular patterns. The two methods are mutually complementary in revealing the interaction between discourse relations and discourse units in a comprehensive manner, as well as in revealing how people process and comprehend discourse dynamically. Accordingly, we propose merging the two methods so as to yield a computational model for assessing discourse complexity and comprehension.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Normative Discourse.Gianfrancesco Zanetti - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (1):44-58.
Discourse Structure and Cartesian Scepticism.David Ryan - 2003 - South African Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):40-50.
D‐LTAG: extending lexicalized TAG to discourse.Bonnie Webber - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (5):751-779.
Sentence and Discourse.Jacqueline Guéron (ed.) - 2015 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
The New Rhetoric’s Inheritance.Ruth Amossy - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):313-324.
Discourse Ethics and Nature.Angelika Krebs - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (3):269-279.
Shifting perspectives in discourse.H. J. Verkuyl & C. F. M. Vermeulen - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (5):503 - 526.
The puzzle of free indirect discourse.Yael Sharvit - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3):353-395.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?