Minding the gap: Why there is still no theory in comparative psychology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (2):152-153 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The prevailing view that there is significant cognitive continuity between humans and other animals is a result of misinterpretations of the role of evolution, combined with anthropomorphism. This combination has often resulted in an over-interpretation of data from animal experiments. Comparative psychology should do what the name indicates: study the cognitive capacities of different species empirically, without naive evolutionary presuppositions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
54 (#288,506)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1898 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
Sense and Nonsense: Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour.Kevin N. Laland & Gillian R. Brown - 2002 - Oxford University Press. Edited by Kevin N. Laland & Gillian R. Brown.
Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial.Frans B. M. de Waal - 1999 - Philosophical Topics 27 (1):255-280.

View all 6 references / Add more references