Methodological Essentialism: Comments on 'Philosophy, Sex, and Feminism' by de Sousa and Morgan

Atlantis 13 (2) (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Doing away with morgan’s canon.Simon Fitzpatrick - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (2):224–246.
Exemplary reasoning? A comment on theory structure in biomedicine.Arthur L. Caplan - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (1):93-105.
Feminism in philosophy of science: Making sense of contingency and constraint.Alison Wylie - 2000 - In Miranda Fricker & Jennifer Hornsby (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 166--184.
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism.Marc Ereshefsky - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Some answers to Max Urchs' comments on a paper by A. Bressan.Aldo Bressan - 1996 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 4:123-131.
Essentialism and anti-essentialism in feminist philosophy.Alison Stone - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (2):135-153.
Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis.Teresa Brennan (ed.) - 1989 - New York: Routledge.
New Essentialism in Biology.Olivier Rieppel - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):662-673.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-27

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alison Wylie
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references