Gender Theory and the Archaeological Record

In Margaret W. Conkey & Joan M. Gero (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Blackwell. pp. 31-54 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,419

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding the Archaeological Record.Gavin Lucas - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Intentions, goals, and the archaeological record.Rex Welshon - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):425-426.
An Expanded Behavioral Archaeology: Transformation and Redefinition Twenty Years On.Alison Wylie - 1995 - In James M. Skibo, William H. Walker & Axel E. Nielsen (eds.), Expanding Archaeology: A Behavioral Approach to the Archaeological Record. University of Utah Press. pp. 198-209.
Archaeological Theory Today.Ian Hodder (ed.) - 2001 - Blackwell.
The reaction against analogy.Alison Wylie - 1985 - Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8:63-111.
The Evolution of Technical Competence: Economic and Strategic Thinking.Ben Jeffares - 2010 - ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science.


Added to PP

8 (#989,199)

6 months
1 (#452,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alison Wylie
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

New philosophies of science in north America — twenty years later.Joseph Rouse - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1):71-122.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references